|
|
Post by fourrums on Jan 8, 2012 15:29:38 GMT 1
Now you are just talking complete nonesense.
The posts are identified as replies. And if the reply doesn't relate to the OP then it is off topic.
I await you ridiculous response with baited breath.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ann1 on Jan 8, 2012 15:36:32 GMT 1
If you say so  Anyway it's not up to you if posts are off topic, if they are then the mods will either move them or warn folk to keep to the topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Jan 8, 2012 16:21:02 GMT 1
As I am now about to do-the topic is breast implants-lets get back to it.
My opinion is that if implants have been done by the NHS as part of a reconstructive process,such as following a masectomy for example-then yes-the NHS should fund their removal.
If the implants were done by the NHS for psychological reasons and it was deemed necessary for the persons well being-for instance in the case of transgender people-then yes-the NHS should fund it.
If however some-one decided they wanted bigger boobs and decided to go and buy them then it should be down to the clinic that did the procedure to remove them and legal action taken against the clinics that refuse to do so-after all they have sold shoddy goods.
|
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Jan 8, 2012 16:42:41 GMT 1
if they are dodgy who ever fitted them should remove them, could never understand why someone would want 2 lumps of silicone stuck inside them anyway, i read somewhere that men were getting testicle implants LOL, i could just imgine it some guy in a night club trying to chat up some lass, here love have you seen the size of my balls.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Jan 8, 2012 17:06:06 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Jan 8, 2012 17:38:18 GMT 1
been going on for years according to this, menshealth.about.com/od/cosmeticsurgery/a/testicular_impl.htmwould not want to get a glass one confused with a glass eye, would make a smashing sound if you dropped a bollock ;D, found it funny where it said in 1976 the food and drug administration became involved, well it is a type of nut. like the article says there are many reasons for getting this done, but i did read about men getting this done purely because they wanted huge balls. |
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Jan 8, 2012 17:44:52 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Jan 8, 2012 17:49:03 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by fourrums on Jan 8, 2012 18:12:12 GMT 1
Would you have any 'surgery'?.
|
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Jan 8, 2012 18:24:22 GMT 1
never ever thought of having cosmetic surgery, mind you the last link i put here really is the dogs bollocks ;D,
could do with some implants in my wallet, would never have cosmetic surgery but i have had surgery for medical reasons.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2012 21:27:54 GMT 1
If effective moderation is changing peoples posts then you do it very well CWL. Did I really write that? Anyway back on topic, the moderators have strayed off again. I see some private clinics have now offered to meet the cost of remedial surgery. Welcome news.  CWL  |
|
|
|
Post by fourrums on Jan 8, 2012 23:18:40 GMT 1
I was expecting something more interesting as a response.
Sadly a lack of interlect, can only offer some image pasted from a movie website.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ann1 on Jan 8, 2012 23:38:55 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by fourrums on Jan 8, 2012 23:44:11 GMT 1
And again
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2012 23:59:55 GMT 1
I was expecting something more interesting as a response. Sadly a lack of interlect, can only offer some image pasted from a movie website. Not a bit of it, just lazy like yourself Rummy. What with your vacuous posts and feable attempts to use words you are unable to even spell correctly. I would hate for other members to get the wrong idea and that you may be considered stupid. CWL  |
|
