|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:13:36 GMT 1
Post by Fairscup on Feb 4, 2011 22:13:36 GMT 1
Just as a matter of interest magpie? Is black white or is white black?
|
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:18:43 GMT 1
Post by magpie4ever99 on Feb 4, 2011 22:18:43 GMT 1
Just as a matter of interest magpie? Is black white or is white black? I'm sorry I didn't get your question. Was I expected to say something clever and witty? I'm sorry but I just know my football very well. And that's all there's to me. If it's a trick question to make me look silly then it's worked. If not then I'd like you to rephrase your question and I'll try my best to answer it. Still don't know what relevance it has to with the football discussion. |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:22:09 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 22:22:09 GMT 1
His best CWL ? Making 100% contradicting statements on consequtive days? See earlier in this thread  That may be as good as it gets. Although strongly suspect it's a similar arrangement to that of when Chris Hughton was here. With The Fat Controllers  spin doctors writing the stuff and the manager being landed with it. We had similar things happen before Pardew arrived. It was only near the end of his time that Hughton clammed up!  Of course it was then Lambs Backside came out of the woodwork again to regale us all with his words of wisdom. CWL  |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:32:23 GMT 1
Post by Fairscup on Feb 4, 2011 22:32:23 GMT 1
Magpie. Since you are coming across as a Contrary Mary and disagreeing with whatever statement I make I was simply trying to find out if your views were genuine or if you were simply looking for a fight.
Statements yesterday about selective reading bamboozled me whilst other at times simple constructive arguments have been ignored. Why not address some of the questions I have posed instead of resorting to accusations about how I make my decisions?
|
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:43:40 GMT 1
Post by magpie4ever99 on Feb 4, 2011 22:43:40 GMT 1
Magpie. Since you are coming across as a Contrary Mary and disagreeing with whatever statement I make I was simply trying to find out if your views were genuine or if you were simply looking for a fight. Statements yesterday about selective reading bamboozled me whilst other at times simple constructive arguments have been ignored. Why not address some of the questions I have posed instead of resorting to accusations about how I make my decisions? Why get personal Fairscup? We were having a perfectly sane football discussion till you bought this up. I think our conversation have been very good natured and I have been enjoying it. No I'm not looking for a fight (how ridiculous that is!). And all of this simply because I had different opinions about the latest Carroll saga and now about Pardew. Well not all think alike. We can carry on the football discussion without getting personal. |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:44:29 GMT 1
Post by Fairscup on Feb 4, 2011 22:44:29 GMT 1
His best CWL ? Making 100% contradicting statements on consequtive days? See earlier in this thread That may be as good as it gets. Although strongly suspect it's a similar arrangement to that of when Chris Hughton was here. With The Fat Controllers spin doctors writing the stuff and the manager being landed with it. We had similar things happen before Pardew arrived. It was only near the end of his time that Hughton clammed up! Of course it was then Lambs Backside came out of the woodwork again to regale us all with his words of wisdom. CWL Pardew has a history of dishonesty which doesn't equate with the Hughton situation. Otherwise I think we are pretty much in agreement  |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:52:59 GMT 1
Post by Fairscup on Feb 4, 2011 22:52:59 GMT 1
OK so your arguments are genuine. That's all I wanted to know. I'll try not to get sidetracked again.
|
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 22:57:56 GMT 1
Post by magpie4ever99 on Feb 4, 2011 22:57:56 GMT 1
OK so your arguments are genuine. That's all I wanted to know. I'll try not to get sidetracked again.  One karma point coming your way |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 4, 2011 23:35:35 GMT 1
Post by Pollypeterborough on Feb 4, 2011 23:35:35 GMT 1
;D
|
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 5, 2011 0:36:12 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2011 0:36:12 GMT 1
Pardew has a history of dishonesty which doesn't equate with the Hughton situation. Otherwise I think we are pretty much in agreement He could have a spotless reputation and I would still hold the belief everything coming out of NUFC at this moment in time is entirely at the whim of one man, Mike Ashley . Like the rest of his entourage Pardew just does as he is told. CWL  |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 5, 2011 8:07:46 GMT 1
Post by Fairscup on Feb 5, 2011 8:07:46 GMT 1
Pardew has a history of dishonesty which doesn't equate with the Hughton situation. Otherwise I think we are pretty much in agreement He could have a spotless reputation and I would still hold the belief everything coming out of NUFC at this moment in time is entirely at the whim of one man, Mike Ashley . Like the rest of his entourage Pardew just does as he is told. CWL I realise that CWL but I don't feel that is a good enough reason for giving him a chance. Hughton came into the job and had the wool pulled over his eyes IMO. Pardew came knowing exactly what his job would be. I mean he'd already seen Hughton sacked for most probably not towing the company line. Again IMO. Pardew is the Casino rat's mate and is fully aware of the game he is playing and with which cards. He is a mouthpiece like Kinnear but knows exactly what he is doing. I will never accept him.  Rant over |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 5, 2011 15:43:29 GMT 1
Post by marlene on Feb 5, 2011 15:43:29 GMT 1
That may be as good as it gets. Although strongly suspect it's a similar arrangement to that of when Chris Hughton was here. With The Fat Controllers spin doctors writing the stuff and the manager being landed with it. We had similar things happen before Pardew arrived. It was only near the end of his time that Hughton clammed up! Of course it was then Lambs Backside came out of the woodwork again to regale us all with his words of wisdom. CWL Pardew has a history of dishonesty which doesn't equate with the Hughton situation. Otherwise I think we are pretty much in agreement You have to be dishonest to work with Ashley and his muppets,Thats why Keegan was forced to leave .  |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 5, 2011 18:30:44 GMT 1
Post by magpie4ever99 on Feb 5, 2011 18:30:44 GMT 1
To those who critize Pards give him credit for masterminding a 4-4 comeback. Surely if when things were going wrong were down to him, he should be credited for the success as well |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 5, 2011 19:01:10 GMT 1
Post by Fairscup on Feb 5, 2011 19:01:10 GMT 1
Sorry mate - I put it down to the players (Both halves) |
|
|
|
Pardew
Feb 5, 2011 19:03:27 GMT 1
Post by magpie4ever99 on Feb 5, 2011 19:03:27 GMT 1
Sorry mate - I put it down to the players And now you'll argue they are Hughton's players lol  Fairsy I know both side of the arguments. But lets give him some credit Fans will always go on past reputation and slaughter him because he works under Ashley. What choice does he have. He's just trying his best. |
|
I've seen Newcastle United win silverware!
One karma point coming your way 
Rant over 
