|
Post by Shadow on Apr 29, 2011 23:25:48 GMT 1
Indeed And how we laughed when the female commentator declared it a triumph for British Fashion
|
|
|
Post by Ann1 on Apr 29, 2011 23:51:42 GMT 1
It was Andy's kid who had the reindeer horn hat. Awful it was Vicky Beckham looked as miserable as sin - probs because she wasn't the centre of attraction Must say Kate looked nice, the dress was spot on, simple and elegant. They'll be living on my home island, I'll drop in for a "pannad" (cup of tea) when I next go to see our kid
|
|
|
Post by LeazesEnder47 on Apr 30, 2011 0:00:22 GMT 1
Bit posh for a "pannad" Ann ;D
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Apr 30, 2011 0:09:24 GMT 1
while scrolling past the wedding rubbish to get to the real news on the DM site i did notice a nice looking lass, Pippa who is kates sister much better looking than Kate, perhaps a bride for Harry.
|
|
|
Post by Ann1 on Apr 30, 2011 8:14:36 GMT 1
Excuse me Leazes!!!! *nose goes in the air* Are you insinuating that "moi" is not capable of holding one's own amongst the aristocracy??? *sniff* I can hold my mug with little finger sticking out with the best of them!!
|
|
|
Post by LeazesEnder47 on Apr 30, 2011 11:14:22 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by nicknackpaddywhack on Apr 30, 2011 11:24:47 GMT 1
while scrolling past the wedding rubbish to get to the real news on the DM site i did notice a nice looking lass, Pippa who is kates sister much better looking than Kate, perhaps a bride for Harry. I would not go as far as she is better looking then Kate but she was a beautiful young lady ....And dare i say it........What a rear end
|
|
|
Post by supergob on May 1, 2011 12:18:23 GMT 1
Meaning exactly what Nick Nack. disagreeing with your leader or just generally having an opinion. Notice the number of contributors has not risen above the Get Along Gang and a few dissenters from the Gazette site.
|
|
|
Post by Banshee on May 1, 2011 15:28:43 GMT 1
Supergob-I am sure that each of us on this forum would welcome more contributers , but unfortunately there wasnt the opportunity to let all of the old chron members know about it. Hopefully through word of mouth the forum might become more widely known. Also lets not go over old greviances. There never was a 'get along gang' on the chron, and I certainly havent noticed one on this forum either. Why dont we all just be one group who all 'get-along'? Now how nice would that be?
|
|
|
Post by Banshee on May 1, 2011 16:47:09 GMT 1
Nick- I am happy to converse with him, but I think he needs to make a new start and not go over old ground. This forum is not the EC, its the CR and a totally different forum. And I think a much better run forum. I dont think it is about anyone being 'fooled' . But more about being open and welcoming to all.
|
|
|
Post by nicknackpaddywhack on May 1, 2011 17:00:49 GMT 1
Nick- I am happy to converse with him, but I think he needs to make a new start and not go over old ground. This forum is not the EC, its the CR and a totally different forum. And I think a much better run forum. I dont think it is about anyone being 'fooled' . But more about being open and welcoming to all. Bansh I agree with you 100% but some people wont change because they dont want to.....The trouble with nice people like you..Shads & Ann is you think theres good in everyone Remember this situation all started because some one couldn't or wouldn't take a joke...A joke from just after the first meet
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on May 1, 2011 17:08:42 GMT 1
I'd like to clarify a couple of points here.
This is not a closed forum and we have taken the decision that anyone is welcome to apply to be part of its membership should they so wish.Equally we agreed that all members would be given a chance to contribute regardless of what occurred on other forums.
Its not a case of mods being fooled into anything-I can assure all of our members that this is far from the case and that each application for membership is carefully considered.
Sensible debate is welcomed and encouraged-however if anyone is joining with the sole intent of pursuing personal vendettas then their membership will be relatively short-lived.
Equally personal abuse will not be tolerated towards either members or moderators.I have no intention of seeing this forum go down the route of the EC.
|
|
|
Post by Ann1 on May 1, 2011 17:24:36 GMT 1
Can't add anything to that, shads has summed it all up.
|
|
|
Post by Roma on May 1, 2011 17:47:13 GMT 1
Well said Shadow ;D
|
|