nickk I think you have muddled yourself up here, I never mentioned which newspapers there are a lot more than the Guardian and Telegraph and I never said they protect them from UKIP, the point is yes they print stories about the other parties but when it comes to UKIP the stories have to be taking with a big pinch of salt, normally mountain size, there is a difference between printing an actual story and twisting things to make something out of nothing.
No, I haven't muddle myself up. I just gave you the benefit of the doubt that you would understand that unless ALL the big newspapers were in it together, then protecting the big parties wouldn't have any effect.
I think skint is doing the British public a bit of disservice. We all know what the media is like, and we have the ability to distinguish between bull shit and facts. There are just too many incidents to blame mischievous media. The fact that Farage has sacked/suspended them speaks volumes. Time to go for lunch in warm sunny Dubai
sourmilky it is strange that you say we have the ability to distinguish between bull shit and facts when you have a track record of failing to distinguish between the two, and yes the fact that Farage sacked/suspended members does speak volumes, it shows he will not accept that sort of thing unlike Labour and Conservative, the House of Commons paedophile ring, the expenses scandal, showing yuppy friends how to avoid tax, these are a few things Labour and Conservative have been up to their neck in, and both Conservative and Labour still have members who HAVE made racist comments.
sourmilky I cant believe you asked that, you criticise UKIP because you believe the utter rubbish the daily rags come out with yet miss this, here something for you to read, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier
it is strange how the dossier has gone missing, Labour and Conservatives would shit themselves if anyone but them got into power things like dossiers disappear easier when they are in power, but after years of shitting on people and breaking promises the gullible still believe the bull and vote for them. and now about this thread is everyone in UKIP a racist, for those who cannot remember why people called them racist it was to do with their views on immigration, it is strange how the other parties laughed at first and now have adopted the same policies but none of them were big enough to say to UKIP sorry you were right.
You've just recited the mantra of the far right parties. The media's out to get us, it's not the fault of any branch of the media that UKIP gives them so much material to work with. So tell everyone the names of those involved in the alleged paedophile ring!!! Or retract the allegation.
sourmilky are you ignorant stupid or blind or could it be you refuse to accept the truth about Labour and the conservatives, i gave a link it explains things try reading it that is how we humans absorb information, it is an on going enquiry which is been hampered due to files and dossiers naming people involved mysteriously disappearing, SO why should i retract the allegations the media in all forms has made, as you are too stupid to search for things here are some more links.
So who are they?........you don't know. Just as the don't know, or care what you've band of fruitcakes and loonies do. Maybe when you grow up, you'll realise insulting people doesn't enhance you views, it diminishes them!
I did open the link with my Nokia 925 (better than iPhones) still no definitive proof. Nothing that will stand up in court. Don't change anything about UKIP they are still a bunch of homophobic racist butters. Maybe that's why they appeal to you?
sourmilky it is an on going investigation but like the article said files and dossiers have disappeared, because it does not include UKIP you have went into you're typical denial role, what I said is what was said in all forms of media and I gave you proof, you're last comment comes without proof so unless you have proof don't you think this is practice what you preach time, lets see who the hypocrite is.
It is an on going investigation so I can't see how you can claim anyone's guilt. It's amazing how you believe what's in the papers or "RAGS" as you put it, apart for what is written about you're beloved UKIP, what one might call a marriage of convenience. Highly hypocritical!
sourmilky take a look at you're very first post and you can see the same thing applies here, I think there is no doubt over guilt just who is involved, judging by you're comments you probably think Cyril Smith and Jimmy Savile are innocent because they are dead and cant defend the claims against them, I also said all media that includes you're luvvy duvvy BBC news, you might understand things more if you ever get into the habit of actually reading a post though understanding it would still be hard for you, I am still waiting for the proof that I and UKIP are racists but that will never materialise because you are a complete bull shitter and you're failing to provide any proof proves that.
sourmilky "never answer" you must be referring to yourself, you also fail to provide proof of you're claims and allegations yet you expect others to provide proof of theirs, try some practice what you preach, you're claim that UKIP will take any old fool is untrue because they would reject you, you are at a level of foolishness that is beyond acceptable, you may not like them but at least UKIP don't seem to have any paedophile and warmonger skeletons in their closet.
