|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2015 23:24:12 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 22, 2015 2:20:22 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by nickkielcepoland on Feb 22, 2015 11:56:28 GMT 1
I agree - there are too many incidents of bigotry among senior UKIP figures for it to be a witch-hunt. |
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 22, 2015 14:42:19 GMT 1
nickk have you been drinking you are getting as daft as old sourmilky, read my links they are but a few of hundreds about racist incidents within the other political parties, unlike the others UKIP expel anyone they find to have made what they view as a racist comment where the other parties in most cases defend their members,
for every racist case within UKIP there will be 10+ in the other parties but they rarely get a mention, nickk you surely must have a brain cell or two more than old sourmilky so do some research which is something old yoghurt pot never does.
|
|
|
|
Post by nickkielcepoland on Feb 22, 2015 14:57:19 GMT 1
nickk have you been drinking you are getting as daft as old sourmilky, read my links they are but a few of hundreds about racist incidents within the other political parties, unlike the others UKIP expel anyone they find to have made what they view as a racist comment where the other parties in most cases defend their members, for every racist case within UKIP there will be 10+ in the other parties but they rarely get a mention, nickk you surely must have a brain cell or two more than old sourmilky so do some research which is something old yoghurt pot never does. Rubbish - the media love scandals involving any senior politicians - they milked for all it was worth Ed Milliband's bacon sandwich incident. Nigel Farage will always come out with the ridiculous notion about the media protecting the other parties (yes, the Telegraph is SOOO going to protect Labour and the Guardian is SOOOO going to protect the Tories). But that is the only line he can think of, as UKIP provide one incident of clownery after another. |
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 22, 2015 16:39:24 GMT 1
so when did Nigel Farage come out with that, if he ever did sourmilky will know he loves Farage, I was stating what is obvious to me and what can be found with very little research, yes the papers love a scandal but everyone seems to love to take the slightest thing involving UKIP and blowing it out of all proportion and turning nothing into something, NONE of the parties are squeaky clean but they all have a lot more skeletons than UKIP hiding in the closet, you and old sourmilky seem to be suffering some form of daily rag tunnel vision.
|
|
|
|
Post by nickkielcepoland on Feb 22, 2015 21:22:04 GMT 1
so when did Nigel Farage come out with that, if he ever did sourmilky will know he loves Farage, I was stating what is obvious to me and what can be found with very little research, yes the papers love a scandal but everyone seems to love to take the slightest thing involving UKIP and blowing it out of all proportion and turning nothing into something, NONE of the parties are squeaky clean but they all have a lot more skeletons than UKIP hiding in the closet, you and old sourmilky seem to be suffering some form of daily rag tunnel vision. Farage always trots out that line - every time some UKIP bigwig has said something unbelievably stupid. I'll admit that I may be wrong, but I don't think the Guardian would protect Tories or the Telegraph protect Labour people. But, as I said, I'll admit that I may be wrong.  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 23:19:13 GMT 1
Skint denies being a UKIP supporter. There appears to be a hypersensitive reaction for him, which seem illogical for a non-supporter. The lady doth protest ect.................................. Did you know Farage drives a Volvo - What!!! driving a imigrant!!! How dare he  |
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 23, 2015 2:00:36 GMT 1
nickk the main papers all have their favourite of the big 3 Labour/Conservative/Lib Dem the Lib Dems are only there because of the coalition, the members of these 3 parties constantly come out with stupid loony things and what could be regarded as racist comments but they never make big news, so they fade away before anything is made from them, take a UKIP member and the papers will twist the slightest thing to make it sound ridiculous or racist, as I said the daily rags will always try to make something out of nothing when it comes to UKIP, take the breast feeding incident as an example of making something out of nothing,
sourmilky I like many have seen the lies and damage the other 3 have caused over the years they don't want someone to come along and shake them up so they try to discredit them, the racist way and they don't have a clue is the usual line they take, the problem is sourmilky someone like you does not care how much the other parties shit on people you even do that to you're own family so why would you care, you will vote for anyone as long as you get you're state funded holidays/car etc.
nickk read the links I put up.
|
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 23, 2015 2:01:08 GMT 1
nickk the main papers all have their favourite of the big 3 Labour/Conservative/Lib Dem the Lib Dems are only there because of the coalition, the members of these 3 parties constantly come out with stupid loony things and what could be regarded as racist comments but they never make big news, so they fade away before anything is made from them, take a UKIP member and the papers will twist the slightest thing to make it sound ridiculous or racist, as I said the daily rags will always try to make something out of nothing when it comes to UKIP, take the breast feeding incident as an example of making something out of nothing,
sourmilky I like many have seen the lies and damage the other 3 have caused over the years they don't want someone to come along and shake them up so they try to discredit them, the racist way and they don't have a clue is the usual line they take, the problem is sourmilky someone like you does not care how much the other parties shit on people you even do that to you're own family so why would you care, you will vote for anyone as long as you get you're state funded holidays/car etc.
nickk read the links I put up.
|
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 23, 2015 2:03:14 GMT 1
LOL this forum seems to have a mind of it's own, I am off somewhere else to talk tropical fish.
|
|
|
|
Post by nickkielcepoland on Feb 23, 2015 7:53:40 GMT 1
nickk the main papers all have their favourite of the big 3 Labour/Conservative/Lib Dem the Lib Dems are only there because of the coalition, the members of these 3 parties constantly come out with stupid loony things and what could be regarded as racist comments but they never make big news, so they fade away before anything is made from them, take a UKIP member and the papers will twist the slightest thing to make it sound ridiculous or racist, as I said the daily rags will always try to make something out of nothing when it comes to UKIP, take the breast feeding incident as an example of making something out of nothing, sourmilky I like many have seen the lies and damage the other 3 have caused over the years they don't want someone to come along and shake them up so they try to discredit them, the racist way and they don't have a clue is the usual line they take, the problem is sourmilky someone like you does not care how much the other parties shit on people you even do that to you're own family so why would you care, you will vote for anyone as long as you get you're state funded holidays/car etc. nickk read the links I put up. You're just saying the same thing again and again - and I'm saying I don't believe the Guardian protects Tories and I don't believe the Telegraph protects Labour people. As for your links, the story about Diane Abbot actually did make the papers, in a big way. I remember it well. I've read your links, I don't think they support your point. If you think I've missed something, explain what it is directly in a post. |
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 26, 2015 11:40:27 GMT 1
Nickk you seem to have missed the point so I will try to explain a little more, Cons and Labour have main papers who support them as they have been the big 2 parties over the years, they don't bother much with the Lib Dems as they tend to use them now and again but UKIP are seen as a threat, they may not get into government but the more seats they win the more of a say they have, to combat the rise in UKIP the big 2 with the help of the main papers have used every dirty tactic they can think of, twisting stories, calling them racists, making stories from nothing, idiots like sourmilky believe all these daily rags stories all the links to them is proof of that, when UKIP come up with something good it is never reported nor does sourmilky put up a link so here is something the main papers and sourmilky were not interested in UKIPs NHS policy. www.ukip.org/ukip_launch_nhs_policy |
|
|
|
Post by nickkielcepoland on Feb 26, 2015 12:50:30 GMT 1
Nickk you seem to have missed the point so I will try to explain a little more, Cons and Labour have main papers who support them as they have been the big 2 parties over the years, they don't bother much with the Lib Dems as they tend to use them now and again but UKIP are seen as a threat, they may not get into government but the more seats they win the more of a say they have, to combat the rise in UKIP the big 2 with the help of the main papers have used every dirty tactic they can think of, twisting stories, calling them racists, making stories from nothing, idiots like sourmilky believe all these daily rags stories all the links to them is proof of that, when UKIP come up with something good it is never reported nor does sourmilky put up a link so here is something the main papers and sourmilky were not interested in UKIPs NHS policy. www.ukip.org/ukip_launch_nhs_policyThere is nothing in the above post which you haven't said before, and which I didn't understand the first time. It is you who have missed the point. Yes, the Tories and Labour have main papers who support them. The Telegraph supports the Tories and the Guardian supports Labour. This is where I disagree with you; You seem to think that the Guardian also protects the Tories (from UKIP) and that the Telegraph also protects Labour (from UKIP). I very much disagree with this - I don't think the Guardian would protect the Tories and I don't think the Tories would protect Labour. I could be wrong, but I don't think it happens. |
|
|
|
Post by skintagain on Feb 26, 2015 13:36:50 GMT 1
nickk I think you have muddled yourself up here, I never mentioned which newspapers there are a lot more than the Guardian and Telegraph and I never said they protect them from UKIP, the point is yes they print stories about the other parties but when it comes to UKIP the stories have to be taking with a big pinch of salt, normally mountain size, there is a difference between printing an actual story and twisting things to make something out of nothing.
|
|
